Rory

My feedback

  1. 47 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rory commented  · 

    Without a doubt the best option. I still think that there should be more green space, finding it hard to believe that out of all this land we can only squeeze a mere 0.56ha of green space. The layout is not optimal, there should be more green space along MacDonald. However, it far surpasses option 1 and 3 which are unworkable, due to congestion alone. This option has a good mix of housing options, single family detached lots for the up and coming young generation and townhouses for others interested in downsizing. There is no room here for condo styled low/medium rise structures, the infrastructure cannot handle the increase in density and any decision should be made taking this into consideration. Along with the fact that residents of SE Oakville have gone for so long without any facilities such as these to speak of, why should we have to sacrifice density in return for these services?

    Rory supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base